SPICER v. CLAREMONT

No. 5113.

104 N.H. 461 (1963)

EARL SPICER & a. v. CLAREMONT & a.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

Decided March 29, 1963.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shulins & Duncan (Mr. Richard C. Duncan orally), for the plaintiffs.

Sulloway, Hollis, Godfrey & Soden and Joseph S. Ransmeier (Mr. Ransmeier orally), for the defendants Charles Hardy and Barbara Hardy.


KENISON, C. J.

Although three questions have been transferred without ruling to this court, counsel have treated the second question as the "primary and main issue in this case." In other words the question is whether, under the zoning ordinance of the city of Claremont, the term "motel" is synonymous with the term "hotel" and is subject to the same limitations as imposed on hotels as defined in article 1, section 1 of ordinance 27 as amended. This ordinance defines...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases