1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 233 Or.
  5. 233 Or. 317 (1963)
 

WOLFF v. DU PUIS

233 Or. 317 (1963)

378 P.2d 707

WOLFF v. DU PUIS

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed and remanded January 30, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin J. Peterson, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Tooze, Powers, Tooze, Kerr & Morrell, Portland.

Robert E. Jones, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Anderson, Franklin, Jones & Olsen, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GOODWIN, J.

This is an action for damages for loss of consortium, brought by a husband whose wife was injured in an automobile collision. The defendant appeals from a judgment which awarded damages to the husband upon a verdict directed in his favor on the score of liability.

The trial court held that inasmuch as the plaintiff's wife earlier had been awarded damages in an action arising...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases