1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 374 U.S.
  5. 374 U.S. 167 (1963)
 

MOSELEY v. ELECTRONIC FACILITIES

No. 401.

374 U.S. 167 (1963)

83 S.Ct. 1815

10 L.Ed.2d 818

MOSELEY, DOING BUSINESS AS MOSELEY PLUMBING & HEATING CO., v. ELECTRONIC & MISSILE FACILITIES, INC., ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 17, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George C. Grant argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was T. Baldwin Martin.

Newell Edenfield argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were William H. Major and Lamar W. Sizemore.

MR. JUSTICE CLARK delivered the opinion of the Court.

The primary issue in this case is whether a claim under the Miller Act, 40 U. S. C. §§ 270a-270d, as amended, based upon arbitration clauses in two subcontracts providing for arbitration of any dispute arising thereunder, is enforceable under the provisions of the United States Arbitration Act. 9 U. S. C. §§ 1, 2 and 3. The institution of this suit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases