Decided, per curiam, December 18, 1963.
PRESCOTT, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.
We, heretofore, decided this case by a per curiam order. We now state our reasons for the decision.
The appellant challenges the validity of an Act of the General Assembly, set forth below. It has literally "thrown the book" at the Act. It states nine separate questions to be answered, with the eighth subdivided into three questions and the ninth into six...
Let's get started

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.