1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 81 N.J.
  5. 81 N.J. Super. 376 (1963)
 

KONITCH v. HARTUNG

81 N.J. Super. 376 (1963)

195 A.2d 649

JOSEPHINE KONITCH, AND NENAD KONITCH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. ALBERT E. HARTUNG, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 3, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. David Shapiro argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Robert J.C. McCoid argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Schneider, Lustbader & Morgan, attorneys).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KILKENNY and COLLESTER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Plaintiffs appeal from a Law Division summary judgment in defendant's favor. The court determined that plaintiff Josephine Konitch's common law negligence action against defendant, her fellow employee, was barred as a matter of law under N.J.S.A. 34:15-8 by reason of both parties being "in the same employ," and that her exclusive remedy was under the Workmen's Compensation Act. Nenad Konitch, her...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases