1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 213 Cal.App.2d
  5. 213 Cal.App.2d 238 (1963)
 

TATE v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY

Docket No. 26836.

213 Cal.App.2d 238 (1963)

28 Cal. Rptr. 548

WENDELL D. TATE et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; NICHOLAS T. LEVATO, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

February 20, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jarrett & Morgan, Frank W. Woodhead, Chase, Rotchford, Downen & Drukker, Richard L. Berger and Henry F. Walker for Petitioners.

Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel, Donald K. Byrne and John J. Collins, Deputy County Counsel, for Respondent.

Arthur Garrett, T. Groezinger, Loton Wells, Edwin J. Dubiel, Arthur Hershenson and Arthur Katz for Real Party in Interest.

FILES, J.

This proceeding involves the application of the principle of Witt v. Jackson, 57 Cal.2d 57 [17 Cal.Rptr. 369, 366 P.2d 641], to a personal injury action which was at issue before that case was decided. A plaintiff, who has received compensation from his employer, has brought a common...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases