1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 219 F.Supp.
  5. 219 F.Supp. 195 (1963)
 

KEUFFEL & ESSER COMPANY v. CHARLES BRUNING CO.

Civ. A. No. 736-62.

219 F.Supp. 195 (1963)

KEUFFEL & ESSER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CHARLES BRUNING CO., Inc., Defendant.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

June 21, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bourne, Schmid, Burke & Noll, Summit, N. J., by Coleman Burke, Summit, N. J., and J. Russel Juten, Peter F. Willig, Hoboken, N. J., Morgan, Finnegan, Durham & Pine, by Hobart N. Durham, New York City, and John C. Vassil, of counsel, for plaintiff.

Yauch & Fagan, Newark, N. J., by James E. Fagan, Newark, N. J., and Mason, Kolehmainen, Rathburn & Wyss, by Richard D. Mason, M. Hudson Rathburn, Chicago, Ill., Warren D. McPhee, and S. L. Goldstein, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for defendant.

WORTENDYKE, District Judge.

Of this patent infringement action, brought under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281, jurisdiction is conferred on this Court by 28 U.S.C. § 1338.

The patent alleged to be infringed is United States Patent No. 3,028,240 ('240) issued April 3, 1962, upon application filed January 15, 1959, to Georg Werner and Gottlieb von Poser, assignors of the plaintiff, Keuffel & Esser Company (K&E). The defendant, Charles Bruning...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases