1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 233 Md.
  5. 233 Md. 138 (1963)
 

BAILEY v. MILLER

[No. 109, September Term, 1963.]

233 Md. 138 (1963)

195 A.2d 601

BAILEY, ET AL. v. MILLER, ET UX.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 10, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John H. Mitchell, with whom were Edward S. Digges and Digges & Mitchell on the brief, for appellants.

George W. Bowling, with whom were Bowling & Perrin on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY and SYBERT, JJ.

HAMMOND, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

The appellants, who operate a sawmill in Charles County close to the residence of the appellees, have appealed because aggrieved at having been held in contempt of court for failing to comply with a decree which enjoined them from operating their mill "in such a manner as to create noise of such volume and quantity as to deprive the Plaintiffs and members of their family from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases