1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 217 F.Supp.
  5. 217 F.Supp. 138 (1963)
 

LANDSBERGER v. FREEMAN

Civ. A. No. 1103-63.

217 F.Supp. 138 (1963)

Leo B. LANDSBERGER et al., Plaintiffs, v. Orville F. FREEMAN, Defendant.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

May 14, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack Marshall Stark, Ross, Stark, Matzkin & Day, Washington, D. C., Clifford E. Simon, Jr., Shoaff, Keegan & Baird, Fort Wayne, Ind., for plaintiffs.

David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., Charles T. Duncan, Principal Asst. U. S. Atty., Joseph M. Hannon and Gil Zimmerman, Asst. U. S. Attys., for defendant.

SIRICA, District Judge.

In this case the plaintiffs filed a complaint in which they allege, in substance, that 7 U.S.C.A. § 1334(a) (b) and (c) (1), and 7 U.S.C.A. § 1336, as amended by Act of September 27, 1962, 76 Stat. 621, are unconstitutional in that they contravene Article 5 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

At the same time, the plaintiffs filed a motion requesting the convening of a three-judge court. The defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases