1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 223 F.Supp.
  5. 223 F.Supp. 129 (1963)
 

ENTEL v. GUILDEN

223 F.Supp. 129 (1963)

Frank ENTEL and Goldie Entel, Plaintiffs, v. Ira GUILDEN et al., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

October 30, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abraham I. Markowitz, New York City, for plaintiffs.

Jacobs, Persinger & Parker, New York City, for defendants Waldo M. Hatch and John C. Paige & Company, Inc.

Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, New York City, for defendants Oswald L. Johnston, Eugene S. Northrop and David A. Stretch.

Stroock, Stroock & Lavan, New York City, for defendant Ira Guilden.

Bisco, Winkler & Higgiston, New York City, for defendant Atlas Corp.

TYLER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Frank and Goldie Entel are, and during the period complained of were, holders of warrants issued by defendant Atlas Corporation ("Atlas"), an investment company which, at all times pertinent to the complaint, was registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940.1 These warrants entitle holders to purchase shares of Atlas common stock at a fixed price ($6...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases