1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 223 F.Supp.
  5. 223 F.Supp. 123 (1963)
 

SCHENLEY INDUSTRIES, INC. v. LADD

Civ. A. No. 1609-62.

223 F.Supp. 123 (1963)

SCHENLEY INDUSTRIES, INC., and Daniel Goldstein, Plaintiffs, v. David L. LADD, Commissioner of Patents, Defendant.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

November 14, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold I. Kaplan, Blum, Moscovitz, Friedman, Blum & Kaplan, New York City, Robert I. Dennison, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

Clarence W. Moore, Sol., Washington, D. C., for defendant.

JACKSON, District Judge.

This civil action was heard on October 29, 1963, and the Court having considered all the evidence presented, including the record in the Patent Office, and arguments of counsel, entered judgment for plaintiffs.

In accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 52(a), 28 U.S.C., the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. This is a civil action brought under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases