1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 41 N.J.
  5. 41 N.J. 295 (1963)
 

LEMKE v. BAILEY

41 N.J. 295 (1963)

196 A.2d 523

ROSE B. LEMKE AND PERCIVAL E. LEMKE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JENNIE D. BAILEY AND WALTER P.D. BAILEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 16, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George P. Moser argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Moser, Roveto & McGough, attorneys; Mr. William V. Roveto, of counsel).

Mr. William M. Feinberg argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Feinberg, Dee & Feinberg, attorneys; Mr. William M. Feinberg, of counsel and on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by HANEMAN, J.

Plaintiffs, both of whom are residents of New Jersey, filed a complaint in the Law Division of the Superior Court on August 21, 1961, seeking recovery of damages allegedly arising from an automobile accident which occurred in this State on October 3, 1958. Service of process on defendants, who are residents of Connecticut, was effected by serving the Director of Motor Vehicles of the State of New Jersey (Director...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases