1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 235 Or.
  5. 235 Or. 73 (1963)
 

IN RE EUGENE C. VENN

235 Or. 73 (1963)

383 P.2d 774

IN RE COMPLAINT AS TO THE CONDUCT OF EUGENE C. VENN, ACCUSED

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Accused reprimanded July 15, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth A. Morrow, Eugene, filed a brief and argued the cause for accused.

Edward V. O'Reilly, Eugene, argued the cause for Oregon State Bar.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and DENECKE, Justices.

ACCUSED REPRIMANDED.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioning attorney admits the truth of the charges made by the bar against him. He admits that his conduct, which was the subject of these charges, was unethical and in violation of the rules of professional conduct. The only question is what, if any, disciplinary action should be taken.

The charges against the petitioner are not serious and do not involve dishonesty. They...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases