1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 223 F.Supp.
  5. 223 F.Supp. 84 (1963)
 

OBERHOLTZER v. LADD

Civ. A. Nos. 1103-62, 1104-62, 1118-62.

223 F.Supp. 84 (1963)

Margaret L. OBERHOLTZER, Plaintiff, v. David L. LADD, Commissioner of Patents, Defendant.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

November 12, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alton V. Oberholtzer, Minneapolis, Minn., Philip E. Siggers, Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Clarence W. Moore, Solicitor, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

JACKSON, District Judge.

The three civil actions involved herein are closely related in substance. They were tried before the Court as a single action, and will be disposed of in one opinion.

All the claims in Civil Action Nos. 1103-62, 1118-62, and the claims in Civil Action No. 1104-62, with the exception of allowed claims 5, and 19 through 22, stand rejected on the prior art which will be noted in the following findings of fact:

FINDINGS OF FACT...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases