1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 39 N.J.
  5. 39 N.J. 208 (1963)
 

MAHONEY v. MINSKY

39 N.J. 208 (1963)

188 A.2d 161

THOMAS MAHONEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. MORRIS MINSKY, ROBERT W. CAVERLY, AND MORRIS MINSKY AND ROBERT W. CAVERLY, PARTNERS, TRADING AS BELLEVUE SURGICAL SUPPLY CO., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 4, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Mr. James A. Major, II, on the brief; Messrs. Major & Major, attorneys).

Mr. Martin J. Brady argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. James M. Barry, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.

Plaintiff Dr. Thomas Mahoney sued defendants Morris Minsky and Robert W. Caverly, individually and as partners trading as Bellevue Surgical Supply Co. on the following note:

"$7,000 Oct. 1, 1954. Two months after date we promise to pay to the order of Dr. Mahoney seven thousand dollars.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases