1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 40 N.J.
  5. 40 N.J. 188 (1963)
 

STATE v. MARGO

40 N.J. 188 (1963)

191 A.2d 43

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM MARGO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 20, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. George R. Sommer argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. John J. Francis, Jr., Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Peter Murray, Assistant Prosecutor, of counsel and on the brief; Mr. Brendan T. Byrne, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of being under the influence of a narcotic drug, heroin, in violation of N.J.S. 2A:170-8, which reads in part:

"Any person who uses or who is under the influence of any narcotic drug, as defined in article 1 of chapter 18 of Title 24 of the Revised Statutes (Food and Drugs), the uniform narcotic drug law, for a purpose other than...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases