1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 41 N.J.
  5. 41 N.J. 143 (1963)
 

ESPOSITO v. ESPOSITO

41 N.J. 143 (1963)

195 A.2d 295

DOMINICK JOSEPH ESPOSITO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MARY RUTH ESPOSITO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 19, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Albert L. Cohn argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. David and Albert L. Cohn, attorneys; Mr. Daniel Crystal, on the brief).

Mr. Theodore S. Meth argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Meth, Bloom & Wood, attorneys; Mr. Hayden C. Covington, of the New York Bar, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff and the defendant were married in 1953 by a Baptist minister in Elkton, Maryland. She had a Protestant background and he was a Roman Catholic, although neither was observant. A child was born in 1956 and was baptized in the Catholic Church. At times prior to September 1960 he was brought to some Protestant services. In September 1960 the defendant became a member of Jehovah's Witnesses. Thereafter serious marital discord arose turning mostly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases