1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 78 N.J.
  5. 78 N.J. Super. 102 (1963)
 

VORNADO, INC. v. R.H. MACY & CO., INC.

78 N.J. Super. 102 (1963)

187 A.2d 620

VORNADO, INC., A KANSAS CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF, v. R.H. MACY & CO., INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided January 10, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel Denstman for plaintiff (Messrs. Simon, Jaffe & Denstman, attorneys).

Mr. Frederick L. Bernstein for defendants R.H. Macy & Co., Inc., Gimbel Bros. Inc., The New York Times Company, The New York Herald Tribune, Inc., The Hearst Corporation and The News Syndicate Co., Inc. (Mr. Walter H. Jones, attorney).

Mr. Donald Wm. deCordova for defendant Stern Bros. Inc. (Messrs. Morrison, Lloyd & Griggs, attorneys).

MINTZ, J.S.C.

Defendants move for judgment on the pleadings. The complaint in substance alleges the following facts.

Plaintiff Vornado, Inc., owns and operates a chain of retail department stores in Bergen, Passaic, Morris, Hudson, Middlesex, Monmouth, Somerset and Union Counties. Defendants R.H. Macy & Co., Inc., Stern Bros., Inc., and Gimbel Bros., Inc. operate department stores in one or more of the counties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases