1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 39 N.J.
  5. 39 N.J. 114 (1963)
 

IN RE KENT

39 N.J. 114 (1963)

187 A.2d 718

IN THE MATTER OF EDWARD KENT, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW, RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 21, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. J. Gilbert Van Sciver, Jr., Chairman, Burlington County Ethics Committee, argued for the order.

Mr. Martin L. Haines argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Dimon, Haines and Bunting, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

Respondent, an attorney-at-law, is charged with violating Canon 9 of the Canons of Professional Ethics which provides in part:

"A lawyer should not in any way communicate upon the subject of controversy with a party represented by counsel; much less should he undertake to negotiate or compromise the matter with him, but should deal only with his counsel."

The complaint against respondent was brought by Mr. James P. Geoghegan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases