1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 316 F.2d
  5. 316 F.2d 912 (1963)
 

UNITED STATES v. VAN de RIET

No. 8867.

316 F.2d 912 (1963)

UNITED STATES of America for the Use and Benefit of the HENRY WALKE COMPANY, a Virginia corporation, Appellant, v. William G. VAN de RIET and Peter H. Van de Riet, partners trading as Van de Riet Construction Company, and Reliance Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania corporation with its principal office in the City of Philadelphia, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Decided April 25, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

P. A. Agelasto, Jr., Norfolk, Va., for appellant.

William P. Oberndorfer, Norfolk, Va. (Kaufman, Oberndorfer, Spainhour & Hall, and Ira B. Hall, Norfolk, Va., on the brief), for appellees.

Before HAYNSWORTH and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

This is an action by plaintiff, The Henry Walke Company, which furnished material on a government contract, to recover the sum of $9,181.20 under the Miller Act (Title 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a et seq.) directly from Van de Riet Construction Company, the prime contractor, and Reliance Insurance Company, the surety on the prime contractor's payment bonds, for such materials furnished to Acme Fence Co., Inc., a subcontractor. The original...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases