1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 223 F.Supp.
  5. 223 F.Supp. 885 (1963)
 

GEORGETOWN CANAL AND RIVERSIDE COUNCIL v. CLOUSER

Civ. A. No. 1299-63.

223 F.Supp. 885 (1963)

The GEORGETOWN CANAL AND RIVERSIDE COUNCIL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Robert O. CLOUSER et al., Defendants.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

October 23, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel Herman, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

Chester H. Gray, Corp. Counsel, John A. Earnest, George H. Clark, and Bruce S. Mencher, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Washington, D. C., for defendants.

LEONARD P. WALSH, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. The plaintiffs filed a complaint for a mandatory injunction to require the Board of Zoning Adjustment to vacate its opinion of December 17, 1962, which ruled there is no manufacturing on the premises of the Howat Concrete Company, and therefore, no violation of the District of Columbia Zoning Regulations.

The Georgetown Canal and Riverside Council is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases