1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 221 F.Supp.
  5. 221 F.Supp. 855 (1963)
 

A. ZERKOWITZ & CO. v. UNITED STATES RUBBER CO.

221 F.Supp. 855 (1963)

A. ZERKOWITZ & CO. et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES RUBBER CO. et al., Defendants.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

July 29, 1963.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hartman & Craven, New York City, for plaintiff.

Arthur, Dry, Kalish, Taylor & Wood, New York City, for defendant United States Rubber Co.

Alexander & Green, New York City, for defendant Rubber Mfgs. Assoc.

White & Case, New York City, for defendant B. F. Goodrich Co.

COOPER, District Judge.

This is a motion by plaintiffs pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for discovery and inspection of certain documents allegedly in the possession of defendants. The defendant, United States Rubber Company (U. S. Rubber), is the only defendant objecting to the motion.

The underlying action is for damages resulting from a conspiracy to violate the anti-trust laws and for restraint of trade. Plaintiffs allege that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases