Supreme Court of Michigan.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided July 17, 1963.
Decided July 17, 1963.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
George R. Sidwell, for plaintiffs.
Schmidt, Smith, Howlett & Halliday (William J. Halliday, Jr., of counsel), for intervening plaintiff City of Wyoming.
Vanderveen, Freihofer & Cook (George R. Cook, of counsel), for defendant.
Dilley & Dilley (Albert R. Dilley, of counsel), for intervening defendant Huizenga.
James K. Miller, for intervening defendant City of Grand Rapids.
Roger D. Anderson, for intervening defendant Board of Education of the City of Grand Rapids.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
O'HARA, J.
This is an annexation case. It arises under section 9 of the home-rule act.1 A recent per curiam opinion2 described the statute as "abstruse." This descriptive euphemism may well qualify as the understatement of the judicial year. The involved section when first enacted contained 22 printed lines. It set out clearly which electors would vote in the annexation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.