1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 205 F.Supp.
  5. 205 F.Supp. 781 (1962)
 

BELL v. CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS PACIFIC RY. CO.

Civ. A. No. 3657.

205 F.Supp. 781 (1962)

Walter W. BELL, Plaintiff, v. The CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY et al., Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. Tennessee, S. D.

May 29, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Atchley & Atchley, Chattanooga, Tenn., for plaintiff.

Whitaker, Hall & Haynes, Chattanooga, Tenn., for defendants.

NEESE, District Judge.

The plaintiff Walter W. Bell was injured when his automobile was in collision with a diesel locomotive at a grade crossing. It is stipulated that the captioned railway company is the only responsive defendant. Bell sued the railway company in the state court, and the case was removed and tried here. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. A jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff and assessed his damages for personal injuries at $13,500.

The defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases