Per Curiam.
Plaintiff-appellant has petitioned for a rehearing, contending that the order filed on March 4, 1960, granting the motion to quash the alias summons and return of service of alias summons, was not a "judgment" within the meaning of H.R.C.P., Rule 73(a), because not entitled "Judgment."
The order of March 4, 1960 not only granted the motion but also "ordered, adjudged and decreed * * * that the summons and the return of service thereof be...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.