WATTS v. PAMA MANUFACTURING COMPANY

No. 167.

124 S.E.2d 809 (1962)

256 N.C. 611

Harold P. WATTS and wife, Janice B. Watts, v. PAMA MANUFACTURING COMPANY.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 11, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mullen, Holland & Cooke and Robert E. Gaines, Gastonia, for plaintiffs.

Hollowell & Stott, Gastonia, for defendant.


MOORE, Justice.

Defendant first assigns as error the denial of its motion for nonsuit. The gist of its argument on this assignment is that there is no evidence that defendant "operated in such a way to occasion more noise and vibration than necessarily results from operation of other plants of like nature and character." It calls attention to the undisputed testimony of the male plaintiff and his father, on cross-examination, that they had worked at a knitting mill...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases