1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 232 Or.
  5. 232 Or. 624 (1962)
 

CATHCART v. CATHCART

232 Or. 624 (1962)

376 P.2d 665

CATHCART v. CATHCART

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed December 12, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Otto R. Skopil, Jr., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Williams & Skopil and Al J. Laue, Salem.

John D. Thomas, Corvallis, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Huston, Thomas & Johnson, Corvallis.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, GOODWIN and DENECKE, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Joy Cathcart, from that part of a divorce decree which awarded to the defendant (father) the custody of the child born to them. Only the part of the decree which pertains to the custody of the child is in issue upon appeal. The divorce was awarded to the father, but that feature of the decree, as just indicated, is not challenged on appeal. The provisions of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases