NATAL v. GUIDO


38 Misc.2d 610 (1962)

George Natal, Respondent, v. Charles Guido, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

October 3, 1962


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph P. Carey for appellant. Saul Roth for respondent.

Concur — HART, DI GIOVANNA and BROWN, JJ.


Per Curiam.

Order modified to the extent that that portion of the ordering provision which reads "unless plaintiff executes a stipulation transferring the above entitled action to the Municipal Court within ten days after entry and service of this order" is stricken, and as so modified, the order is affirmed, with $10 costs and taxable disbursements. The granting of the motion upon the provision stated was an improvident exercise of discretion. The issue as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases