1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 309 F.2d
  5. 309 F.2d 326 (1962)
 

DANTZLER v. DICTOGRAPH PRODUCTS, INC.

No. 8585.

309 F.2d 326 (1962)

M. O. DANTZLER, Appellee, v. DICTOGRAPH PRODUCTS, INC., Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Decided September 24, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Ensher, New York City (Clayton & London, O. W. Clayton, Charlotte, N. C., Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, and Stephen S. Ziegler, New York City, on brief), for appellant.

William B. Webb, Charlotte, N. C. (Carpenter, Webb & Golding, Charlotte, N. C., on brief), for appellee.

Before SOPER, HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges.

SOPER, Circuit Judge.

This suit, now before us the second time, was brought by M. O. Dantzler v. Dictograph Products, Inc., to recover damages for breach of contract and for unlawful discrimination against him in violation of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 13(d) and 13(e). Under a contract between the parties Dantzler, who was located at Charlotte, North Carolina, was a distributor for Dictograph Acousticon hearing aids in seventeen counties in North Carolina...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases