1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 213 F.Supp.
  5. 213 F.Supp. 421 (1962)
 

OETKER v. GOLDSMITH

61-C-893.

213 F.Supp. 421 (1962)

Rudolf A. OETKER, Plaintiff, v. Rudolf F. GOLDSMITH et al., Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

June 14, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Rowan, New York City (Platow & Lyon, New York City, of counsel), for defendant Rudolf F. Goldsmith in support of motion for summary judgment.

Richard L. Newman, New York City (Nattier & Anderson, New York City, of counsel), for defendant Brazilian Coffee Institute, opposed.

Michael H. Greenberg, New York City (Graubard & Moskovitz, New York City, of counsel), for defendant Carl Borchsenius, Co. Inc., attaching creditor opposed.

Tallman Bissell, New York City (Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City, of counsel), for Rudolf A. Oetker, plaintiff in interpleader.

DOOLING, District Judge.

In a carrier's interpleader suit, defendant Goldsmith moves for summary judgment awarding him possession of certain bills of lading covering coffee made out to his order which the defendant Brazilian Coffee Institute, an agency of the United States of Brazil, holds in its possession. Goldsmith contends that he bought the coffee symbolized by the bills of lading from "defendant" Exportadora e Importadora Visalia, Ltda., a Brazilian company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases