1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 230 Or.
  5. 230 Or. 379 (1962)
 

HAYNER v. BURNS ET UX

230 Or. 379 (1962)

370 P.2d 235

HAYNER v. BURNS ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed April 4, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce J. Manley, Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was John M. Ross, Medford.

Ervin B. Hogan, Medford, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Frohnmayer, Lowry, Hogan & Deatherage, Medford.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and WARNER, SLOAN and O'CONNELL, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

In his abstract and brief plaintiff states that this is a proceeding in equity for the dissolution of a partnership and an accounting. It was claimed that plaintiff and defendant Robert Burns formed a partnership to exploit some mining claims in Colorado.

At the conclusion of the trial and later by a written opinion, the trial court found a complete lack of any evidence sustaining plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases