HUDSON v. HUDSON


36 N.J. 549 (1962)

178 A.2d 202

MARION HUDSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. DANNIE BENJAMIN HUDSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND FRANCES COSTELLO HUDSON, INTERVENOR-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 19, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. A. Howard Finkel argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Henry Goldhor, attorney).

Mr. Morris N. Hartman argued the cause for defendant-appellant and intervenor-appellant.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.

Plaintiff Marion Hudson sought a judgment for arrearages of alimony due from her former husband, Dannie Hudson, under a divorce decree she obtained in the State of Alabama on October 9, 1958. In attempting to avoid payment, defendant contended that the divorce was obtained by fraud, that the separation agreement between the parties fixing the alimony payments, which was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases