1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 201 F.Supp.
  5. 201 F.Supp. 373 (1962)
 

MIRSCHEL v. ZAMPANO

Civ. No. 9121.

201 F.Supp. 373 (1962)

Charles E. MIRSCHEL, Jr. and Katherine C. Mirschel v. Robert C. ZAMPANO, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut.

United States District Court D. Connecticut.

January 23, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cooney & Scully, by John F. Scully, Hartford, Conn., for plaintiffs.

Robert C. Zampano, U. S. Atty., New Haven, Conn., for defendant.

BLUMENFELD, District Judge.

I.

Petitioners' Claim

The petitioners claim that their retained copies of federal income tax returns for the years 1955, 1956, 1957 and 1958, books and records, ledger sheets, cancelled checks, etc. for those years were obtained by Internal Revenue Agent Rehm and Special Agent Harman of the Intelligence Division of the Internal Revenue Bureau and that a Question and Answer (Q & A) statement of Charles E. Mirschel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases