1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 372 P.2d
  5. 372 P.2d 161 (1962)
 

BUNZEL v. CITY OF GOLDEN

No. 19859.

372 P.2d 161 (1962)

Everett C. BUNZEL, individually and doing business as the Golden Bowl, Plaintiff in Error, v. CITY OF GOLDEN, a Municipal Corporation organized under the laws of the State of Colorado, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado. En Banc.

June 11, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marshall Quiat, Arvada, for plaintiff in error.

Bradley, Carney & Johnson, Golden, for defendant in error.

MOORE, Justice.

We will refer to plaintiff in error by name and to defendant in error as Golden or the city.

Bunzel, by complaint for declaratory judgment, sought to invalidate a city ordinance on the ground that it, as amended, violated Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitution of Colorado and the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

In substance, it was stipulated that Bunzel owned property in Golden and conducted a bowling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases