1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 77 N.J.
  5. 77 N.J. Super. 423 (1962)
 

WEBER v. PIERETTI

77 N.J. Super. 423 (1962)

186 A.2d 702

LOUIS WEBER ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JOSEPH PIERETTI, JR. AND MARIE PIERETTI, INDIVIDUALLY AND T/A BROOKDALE BEVERAGE CO., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF BLOOMFIELD ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 19, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bernard Hellring argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Hellring, Lindeman and Lieberman, attorneys; Mr. Norman Bruck, on the brief).

Mr. David A. Rappeport argued the cause for respondents.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and FOLEY.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under appeal is affirmed for the reasons stated by Judge Mintz sitting in the Chancery Division, Weber v. Pieretti, 72 N.J.Super. 184 (1962), except that we do not join in that part of his decision relating to collateral estoppel by judgment (at pages 192-3).

Defendants Pieretti call attention to the fact that the trial judge failed to consider their contention that their present...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases