1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 232 Or.
  5. 232 Or. 179 (1962)
 

SPRINGSTEAD v. LINCOLN CAS. INS. CO.

232 Or. 179 (1962)

374 P.2d 751

SPRINGSTEAD v. LINCOLN CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed September 26, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles D. Burt, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Burt & Ertsgaard, Salem.

Myron L. Enfield, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Rhoten, Rhoten & Speerstra, Salem.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

SLOAN, J.

In this case it is necessary to interpret some of the provisions of the Financial Responsibility Act, Chapter 486 of ORS. The trial court sustained a demurrer to the complaint. Plaintiff appeals.

The pertinent allegations are these: In 1959 defendant issued to plaintiff its policy of liability insurance. The policy was issued to satisfy the requirements of the Act to enable plaintiff to retain his driver's license. When issued,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases