1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 233 Or.
  5. 233 Or. 166 (1962)
 

WHITLOCK v. STATE IND. ACC. COMM.

233 Or. 166 (1962)

377 P.2d 148

WHITLOCK v. STATE INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed December 31, 1962.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James O. Goodwin, Oregon City, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Jack, Goodwin & Anicker, Oregon City.

George S. Woodworth, Assistant Attorney General, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, and Ray H. Lafky, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, O'CONNELL, LUSK and DENECKE, Justices.

REVERSED.

ROSSMAN, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff, Walter Whitlock, from a judgment which the circuit court entered in favor of the defendant, State Industrial Accident Commission, after sustaining a motion of the defendant for the entry of judgment in its favor as permitted by ORS 18.140 notwithstanding the jury's return of a verdict in the plaintiff's favor. The action was instituted by the plaintiff upon averments that while he was in the employ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases