FREEL v. OZARK-MAHONING COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 6928.

208 F.Supp. 93 (1962)

A. E. FREEL and Beatrice Hope Freel, Plaintiffs, v. OZARK-MAHONING COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court D. Colorado.

August 29, 1962.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stockton, Linville, Lewis & Mitchell, John H. Lewis, and Creamer & Creamer, George L. Creamer, Denver, Colorado, for plaintiffs.

Wormwood, O'Dell & Wolvington, Leonard L. Beal, Weller, Friedrich & Hickisch, W. Robert Ward, and Wood, Ris & Hames, Stephen E. Connor, Denver, Colo., and Morrison, Hecker, Cozad & Morrison, Karl F. Schmidt, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant.


DOYLE, District Judge.

The above-entitled action was tried to the Court on August 21 through August 23, 1962. The Court now finds the facts and concludes as follows:

I.

THE PLEADINGS AND ISSUES

The action seeks damages for injury to property resulting from contamination and pollution of a stream and from alleged flooding of the plaintiffs' lands as a result of failure to contain mine tailings ponds.

The complaint alleges that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases