1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 200 F.Supp.
  5. 200 F.Supp. 678 (1961)
 

KESLER v. SCHETKY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION

Civ. No. 7990.

200 F.Supp. 678 (1961)

Irving K. KESLER, Don Kesler and Henry A. Kesler, Plaintiffs, v. SCHETKY EQUIPMENT CORPORATION, an Oregon corporation, Clement-Braswell, an individual, Clement-Braswell, Inc., a Louisiana corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. California, N. D.

December 7, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victor L. Huber, Marysville, Cal., for plaintiffs.

John F. Downey and Downey, Brand, Seymour & Rohwer, Sacramento, Cal., for defendant Schetky Equipment Corp.

HALBERT, District Judge.

Defendant Schetky has moved in this action to quash service of summons and to dismiss the action. The ground for such motion is that this Court lacks jurisdiction over Schetky. It is asserted that Schetky is an Oregon corporation, with its principal place of business in Oregon, and that it does no business in California which would make it subject to service of process of this Court.

For the purpose of deciding a motion to quash service...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases