1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 224 Md.
  5. 224 Md. 591 (1961)
 

HECKROTTE v. RIDDLE

[No. 159, September Term, 1960.]

224 Md. 591 (1961)

168 A.2d 879

HECKROTTE, JR., ET UX. v. RIDDLE, SR.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided March 28, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Thomas Nissel and Raymond G. Thieme, Jr., with whom were McDermott, Nissel & Thieme on the brief, for appellants.

William F. Mosner, with whom were Downes & Deitz on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, HORNEY and MARBURY, JJ.

HORNEY, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

When the Circuit Court for Baltimore County sustained, without leave to amend, the demurrer of William E. Riddle, Sr. (seller-builder or appellee) to the amended two-count declaration of Carroll E. Heckrotte, Jr. and wife (buyers or appellants), the aggrieved buyers appealed.

Both counts of the amended declaration alleged that the appellants, as buyers, and the appellee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases