1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 192 F.Supp.
  5. 192 F.Supp. 581 (1961)
 

HUNGERFORD v. UNITED STATES

Civ. No. 8122.

192 F.Supp. 581 (1961)

Victor M. HUNGERFORD, Jr., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Does One through Twenty, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. California, N. D.

Supplemental Opinion April 18, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Belli, Ashe and Gerry, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff.

Laurence E. Dayton, U. S. Atty. and Frederick J. Woelflen, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.

HALBERT, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action against the United States and twenty fictitious defendants. The United States has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction, and for failure to state a cause of action (Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b), 28 U.S.C.A.). The United States has also filed a motion to strike certain portions of plaintiff's complaint. In view of the conclusion reached on the motion to dismiss, the motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases