1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 195 F.Supp.
  5. 195 F.Supp. 572 (1961)
 

LUMMUS COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OIL REFINING COMPANY

195 F.Supp. 572 (1961)

In the Matter of the Arbitration of Certain Differences between LUMMUS COMPANY, Petitioner, and COMMONWEALTH OIL REFINING COMPANY, Inc., Respondent.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

June 7, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cahill, Gordon, Reindel & Ohl, New York City, for petitioner. Lawrence J. McKay, Raymond L. Falls, Jr., Thomas F. Curnin, Joseph M. McLaughlin, New York City, of counsel.

Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, for respondent. Richard deY. Manning, New York City, Ruben Rodriguez-Antongiorgi, San Juan, P. R., Milton Pollack, John F. Dooling, Jr., New York City, of counsel.

DAWSON, District Judge.

Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "Commonwealth") moved by order to have the Lummus Company (hereinafter referred to as "Lummus") show cause why all proceedings in connection with the arbitration demanded by Lummus should not be stayed until after Lummus has brought on for hearing its pending petition to compel arbitration and until the determination thereof. Alternatively, Lummus was ordered to show cause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases