1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 193 F.Supp.
  5. 193 F.Supp. 535 (1961)
 

MAYTAG COMPANY v. MURRAY CORPORATION OF AMERICA

No. 16781.

193 F.Supp. 535 (1961)

MAYTAG COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. MURRAY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. Michigan, S. D.

March 28, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarence B. Zewadski, Whittemore, Hulbert & Belknap, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiff.

Patrick H. Hume, Frank F. Reed, Byron, Hume, Groen & Clement, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Arthur W. Dickey, Robert L. Boynton, Harness, Dickey & Pierce, Detroit, Mich., for defendant.

FREEMAN, District Judge.

Facts

This is an action for infringement of Letters Patent No. 2,717,456 issued to Thomas R. Smith on September 13, 1955, and presently owned by the plaintiff, Maytag Company. In its answer the defendant, Murray Corporation of America, denies infringement and alleges that the patent is invalid for lack of novelty and invention.

The patent in issue is a combination patent relating to a clothes drier of the type generally utilized...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases