DIME SAV. BANK OF BROOKLYN v. PINE DRIVE ASSOCS.


28 Misc.2d 648 (1961)

Dime Savings Bank of Brooklyn, Plaintiff, v. Pine Drive Associates, Inc., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County.

February 27, 1961


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tannenbaum & Goldweber for Preferred Transmix Concrete, Inc., defendant. William A. Anzalone for plaintiff.


MARIO PITTONI, J.

Motion "for an order directing the plaintiff to accept the answer of the defendant Preferred Transmix Concrete, Inc.", is denied.

The movant was served with the summons and complaint on January 9, 1961. The answer was mailed on February 3, 1961, received and returned on February 6. 1961. No affidavit of merits is submitted, nor is any reasonable excuse given for the failure to serve the answer within 20 days after service of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases