1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 198 F.Supp.
  5. 198 F.Supp. 367 (1961)
 

O'NEILL v. UNITED STATES

Civ. No. 17013.

198 F.Supp. 367 (1961)

John F. O'NEILL, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

October 10, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert Podrid, New York City, by Albert B. Lewis, New York City, of counsel, for plaintiff.

Joseph P. Hoey, U. S. Atty., Brooklyn, N. Y., by Lee Phillips and Leonard Goldberg, Attorneys, Tax Division, Washington, D. C., for defendant.

RAYFIEL, District Judge.

This is an action, under Section 1346 (a) (1), of Title 28 United States Code, to recover the sum of $751.23 which the plaintiff claims the District Director of Internal Revenue, Brooklyn, New York, has illegally, erroneously and excessively collected from him for excise taxes on wagering, and for abatement of an allegedly illegal, arbitrary and excessive assessment for excise taxes on wagering levied against him by the said District Director...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases