1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 196 F.Supp.
  5. 196 F.Supp. 367 (1961)
 

NACHTMAN v. TOULMIN

No. 2548.

196 F.Supp. 367 (1961)

John S. NACHTMAN, Plaintiff, v. Harry A. TOULMIN, Jr. and The Commonwealth Engineering Company of Ohio, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. Ohio, W. D.

June 27, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marechal, Biebel, French & Bugg, Dayton, Ohio, Ooms, McDougall, Williams & Hersh, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for plaintiff.

Pickrel, Schaeffer & Ebeling, Dayton, Ohio, for defendants.

WEINMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motions of defendants, Harry A. Toulmin, Jr. and The Commonwealth Engineering Company of Ohio, to quash summons and on the motions of defendants, Harry A. Toulmin, Jr., and The Commonwealth Engineering Company of Ohio, to dismiss the complaint.

The background of this matter is as follows:

On October 3, 1955, the United States Patent Office...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases