1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 198 F.Supp.
  5. 198 F.Supp. 359 (1961)
 

UNITED STATES v. WAPNICK

No. 60-Cr-63.

198 F.Supp. 359 (1961)

UNITED STATES of America v. Harold WAPNICK et al., Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

October 17, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph P. Hoey, U. S. Atty., E. D. New York, Brooklyn, N. Y., for the United States; John A. Occhiogrosso, Asst. U. S. Atty., Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel.

Herbert S. Siegal, New York City, for defendant Harold Wapnick.

BARTELS, District Judge.

Motion by defendant Harold Wapnick to dismiss the indictment herein, which indictment alleges substantive violations of the Dyer Act (18 U.S.C.A. § 2312) and conspiracy to violate the same (18 U.S. C.A. § 371). The moving affidavit alleges that defendant Wapnick was tried by the State of New York and acquitted in the County Court, Bronx County, on charges covering the same automobiles involved in the instant indictment. He states...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases