BYRAM CONCRETANKS, INC. v. MEANEY

No. 13483.

286 F.2d 170 (1961)

BYRAM CONCRETANKS, INC., Petitioner v. Honorable Thomas F. MEANEY, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided January 19, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frankel & Frankel, Paterson, N. J., for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and FORMAN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

This is an action for mandamus brought against one of the district judges for the District of New Jersey. The allegation complains that the district judge unduly restricted the applicant in his interrogatories in a pending litigation and that he acted contrary to what one of his fellow judges had ordered on the same point. We think that this is not a proper case for mandamus. TCF Film Corp. v. Gourley, 3 Cir....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases