1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 35 N.J.
  5. 35 N.J. 239 (1961)
 

IN RE SCHEDULE FILED BY HACKENSACK WATER CO.

35 N.J. 239 (1961)

172 A.2d 651

IN THE MATTER OF THE SCHEDULE FILED BY HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, INCREASING AND CHANGING RATES FOR WATER SERVICE. HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 30, 1961.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Randall J. LeBoeuf, Jr., of the New York Bar, argued the cause for appellant Hackensack Water Company (Mr. Samuel W. Zerman, attorney).

Mr. Alfred W. Kiefer argued the cause for appellant Rate Counsel (Mr. Christian Bollermann, on the brief).

Mr. Richard F. Green, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent Board of Public Utility Commissioners (Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

This litigation arises out of a proceeding by Hackensack Water Company (Hackensack) for a revision of rates. The De Forest Lake reservoir was constructed in the State of New York by Spring Valley Water Works and Supply Company (Spring Valley). Spring Valley is a wholly owned subsidiary of Hackensack. Hackensack and Spring Valley entered into a contract for the division of the annual operating costs of the reservoir...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases