PREZLAK v. PADRONE


67 N.J. Super. 95 (1961)

169 A.2d 852

MAURICE G. PREZLAK AND MARIE PREZLAK, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS, v. CARL A. PADRONE AND DONALD F. MacART, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided March 29, 1961.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Julius Fielo, attorney for plaintiffs.

Mr. Russel E. Greco, attorney for defendants.


MATTHEWS, J.C.C. (specially assigned).

This is a proceeding in lieu of prerogative writs, in which plaintiffs, as citizens and taxpayers of the City of East Orange, challenge the action taken by a bare majority of the remaining members of the city council of that city in seating the defendant Padrone as a member of such council.

At the outset, it is observed that plaintiffs are proper parties to the action herein instituted in that they do not seek to attack...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases